Archive for the ‘Private Equity’ Category

The QE 2 Leaves Port

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

Fed Chair Bernanke launched QE 2 Wednesday afternoon, and it’s as imposing as the real thing. The Federal Reserve announced it will buy up to $600 billion of U.S. government bonds over the next eight months.

QE 2 (Quantitative easing) is a euphemism for the (second) monetization of government debt this year, and is the electronic equivalent of printing money. The Fed’s goal is to create an environment where interest rates are so low that investments in fixed income (or cash) are so unattractive that it will result in a rising stock market by stimulating demand through a “wealth effect”. Some economists believe the Fed is exchanging one bubble (the bond market) for another, the stock market.

For investors, they have their marching orders. The Fed’s have provided the most compelling environment for equity investments in many years.

All aboard!

Tips for Success

Wednesday, October 13th, 2010

On Monday, October 11, 2010, Thomas Heath commented on “The Intelligent Entrepreneur: How Three Harvard Business School Graduates Learned the 10 Rules of Successful Entrepreneurship”, a book written by Bill Murphy, a former Washington Post reporter and aspiring entrepreneur. 

Murphy’s 10 rules for success include:

1.) Be committed to entrepreneurship, the act of creating something, rather than a single idea.

2.) Solve a problem.

3.) Think big. Think new. Think again.

4.) You can’t do it alone.

5.) You must do it alone. Be decisive.

6.) Manage risk.

7.) Lead.

8.) Learn to sell.

9.) Persistence is everything.

10.) Time, not money, is the key resource.

 

I work with many small- and medium-sized businesses.  I’ve seen the bad, the good and the ugliest of outcomes from entrepreneurship.  Murphy is right “you can’t do it alone”.  Your support team should not only consist of a business partner and trusted friends, but also a trusted financial advisor to help you construct a business plan.  A lot of entrepreneurs have good ideas, but formulating a business plan is outside their skill set.   A financial advisor can give a clear description of how one will make money, including a time table of when the cash flow is going to start and what is the expected rate of return.  You need to have an advisor that’s going to explain to you the facts of life – not tell you what you want to hear.  They’ve got to tell you the bad news and the good news. 

Lastly, you must work hard and hire the best and brightest people you can find.

Obama Proposes 100 Percent Bonus Depreciation for 2011

Friday, September 10th, 2010

On September 8, 2010, Obama proposed a 100 percent bonus depreciation tax incentive for 2011 and asked Congress to make the research-and-development (R&D) tax credit permanent.

Obama proposes to increase the current 50% bonus depreciation deduction to 100%, retroactive to September 8, 2010. This deduction applies to purchases of equipment such as vehicles, solar panels, and computers.

The Administration hopes to encourage business investment and support the business community by making the R&D tax credit permanent and increasing bonus depreciation.

Don’t buy any equipment just yet. We’ll inform you once Congress has voted.

Legislation on the Taxation of Carried Interest Update

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Congress has yet to vote on the expiring tax extenders legislation, which includes a provision that would regulate the taxation of carried interest, and will not address the matter before the August recess.

The legislation’s current form taxes 75% of carried interest at the ordinary income rates and 25% at capital gain rates, without regard to the character of the underlying income.  Industry groups such as the Private Equity Council and the National Venture Capital Association are continuing to make their voices heard inside the halls of Congress by educating Senators and Representatives about the vital role that venture capital plays in innovation and job creation, and the potential negative effects the bill could have within the industry, and more importantly, the broader economy.

Banking Alternatives for Small Business

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

A number of our clients have run into a brick wall trying to secure working capital and lines of credit from their bank. Large and small banks underwriting for small business loans have become increasingly stringent. Banks reluctance to lend money is understandable, given the increased regulatory pressures on banks and the financial impact of the poor economy on the balance sheets of many of our clients. moneytree

McQuadeBrennan’s pro-active client services have found an interesting solution to the lack of credit available to many of our small business clients, non-profit associations, and private equity managers.

The Receivables Exchange is an online service that matches investors (lenders) with companies and organizations that seek to liquefy its receivables. The Exchange is an innovative cash flow solution that assists company’s access to work capital. The New York Times referred to The Receivables Exchange as the “eBay of working capital.” Here’s how it works. Let’s say you are a non-profit organization with recurring (or nonrecurring) receivables from long standing members that may be getting old for some reason. After you have registered as a client of The Receivables Exchange, you would post the dues, or accounts receivable, you want to liquefy. Investors will complete for your business by effectively bidding an interest rate for the receivables you posted with The Exchange. The average rate charged to participants in The Exchange is 1 ½% per month, but your initial transactions may be more expensive until investors get comfortable with your organization and track record.

The investors who supply the liquidity are largely institutional, and include hedge funds and investment banks. An account is established in your organization’s name at JP Morgan, and you direct your receivable to make payment directly to the account, so you maintain complete confidentiality.

The application process is fairly extensive, but after you are up and running, the posting of receivables and cash transfers becomes fairly routine.

For-Profit Schools Update

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

The discussion of for-profit universities continues in a recent New York Times editorial: Who Profits? Who Learns?. 

 

It reiterates many abuses by these schools including high student debt-to-income ratios, low graduation rates, and reliance on federal student aid for the bulk of their revenue. We’ve discussed these concerns in more detail previously (The Next Big Short – the For-Profit Colleges).  This editorial outlines proposed rules that seek to protect students and limit federal funding to for-profit schools.  Provisions include oversight of the student recruiting process and licensure of for-profit universities.  See our previous post for a detailed review of the proposed rules. 

 

This environment presents an excellent investment opportunity – short Appollo, DeVry and Capella.

 

Check out the price action of the following publicly traded for-profit/internet schools over the past months:

 

for-profit-schools

Thanks Congress – We Really Need a Tax Increase

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

Coming down the pipeline and ignored by Congress, is a waterfall of potential tax increases, the likes of which we haven’t seen for a decade. The massive amounts of legislation this year coupled with sunset provisions create a perfect storm for taxpayers.

The recent healthcare legislation was also a tax bill. From a new tax surcharge on tanning salons, all the way to altering the way millions of Americans purchase medications. If you have grown used to using your flexible spending account (FSA), health savings account (HSA), or a similar vehicle for non-prescription medications – other than insulin, these medications will now have to be purchased with after-tax dollars.

The healthcare legislation also limits the dollars that can be placed in an FSA to $2,400, drastically limiting the tax advantages. This limitation will have a particularly severe impact on disabled individuals and parents of disabled children who have used pre-tax dollars to pay for expensive treatments, medical devices, and related education.

After January 1, 2011, it will be much more expensive to die; the “Death Tax” returns, taxing up to 55% on an estate of $1 million, a threshold that will be surprisingly easy to reach.

The tax ratio in effect since the early 2000s will be rolled back: the lowest bracket will go from 10% to 15% and the highest from 35% to 39.6%. This will be in addition to narrower tax brackets for taxpayers filing jointly, a significantly lower child tax credit, lower adoption credit, lower dependent care tax credit, and a lower standard deduction.

Retirees will pay both higher capital gains tax, going from 15% to 20%, and higher taxes on dividend income, going from 15% to 39.6%. Charitable contributions from IRAs will be discontinued, and rules governing student loan interest deductions are changing, for the worse.

There’s more.  If you currently receive health insurance, your W-2 will show a big gain next year, but not in a good way. You will magically have more gross income, monies that you never saw, that went to purchase health insurance will now be taxable income; this has the potential to push taxpayers into higher brackets even though they never saw any additional net earnings.

Businesses will also be hit with tax increases with significant changes in what can and cannot be deducted. Business tax brackets are set for a similar shift as individual taxpayers. Small, job creating, businesses that are used to expensing equipment purchases up to $250,000 will see the decimal in a different place as the ceiling decreases to a mere $25,000. One of the most notable business tax credits that is being eliminated is the research tax credit, although it has repeatedly been extended, its political future is unsure at best. There are a plethora of other changes, and their implementation and enforcement specifics are still up in the air. 

Finally, Congress has repeatedly raised the Alternative Minimum Tax dollar threshold, which is not tied to inflation, and is likely to do so in the future.  As of today, many middle class taxpayers are subject to this “backup tax” in 2011. 

Hopefully, Congress will scrutinize many of these tax increases.  Though they were designed to pay for current legislation, the political will to maintain them is questionable. The tax code is tedious, but it is changing quickly, and will continue to do so. We’ll keep you posted.

Corporate Income Tax – The Impediment to Job Growth

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

On May 6, 2010, Michael Boskin wrote an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal about the largest impediment to growth in the U.S., the corporate income tax.  I previously addressed the same subject in February 2009 and essentially presented the same facts regarding the District’s corporate income tax and its hindrance to job growth.

 US Capitol Building

Not only is the corporate income tax harmful to economic growth, but its existence results in wasteful distortions of assets, cash flow, and, of course, wages. As a CPA who has witnessed the constant tinkering of the tax code over the years, I can vouch for the argument that economic distortions are regularly undertaken by clear thinking business men and women in the pursuit of tax avoidance.

 

To date, politicians have been unable to accept the premise that less is more when it comes to corporate income taxes, at the state or federal level. Corporations are job machines. To discourage corporate formation or growth is to discourage job growth. It’s a real shame that the District doesn’t exploit its extraordinary advantage as the center of the free world.;”>


The elimination of the D.C. corporate income tax would have an astonishing impact on job growth in the District. Remember
Northrop Grumman? They did a brief fly over, saw the District’s 9.975% tax, and promptly set-up shop in Virginia.

Impaired Investors

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

This audit season has been a learning experience for many of our young staff. They have been introduced to the obscure and rarely applied accounting dictum known as impairment. As we all know, Washington real estate had been the road to riches for many investors. The stability provided by the Federal government and legions of lawyers and consultants who feed at the public trough has provided the D.C. real estate market with stability unlike any other market place. Until now. The recent sale of the Mortgage Bankers Association’s headquarters to CoStar Group gave new insight into the meaning of impairment. 700_6th_st

 

Our audit staff has had numerous, awkward conversations with our real estate clients regarding the real value of their investments. In a number of cases, we have come to the conclusion (which, our clients reluctantly agreed) that the historical cost of certain real estate investments carried on some entities’ books is significantly higher than its net realizable value.

 

In 30 years of practicing in this town, I have never witnessed a situation like the one we are in. The late 80’s was tough, but brief. This environment seems to drag on, with no end in sight. The market needs equity, and more cooperation from banks and financial institutions to get deals done.

 

Capital investment is the heart of job growth and there is little of it going on now.

Tax Benefits for Employers Who Hire and Retain Unemployed Workers

Friday, March 19th, 2010

US Capitol BuildingOn Thursday, March 18, 2010, the IRS announced two new tax benefits available to employers hiring workers who were previously unemployed or only working part time. These provisions are part of the new Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act.

Payroll Tax Incentive

Employers who hire unemployed workers after Feb. 3, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2011 may retain the employer portion of the Social Security tax ordinarily paid. Employers are exempt from paying their 6.2 percent of Social Security taxes on wages paid after March 18, 2010.  This reduced tax withholding will have no effect on the employee’s future Social Security benefits, and employers would still need to withhold the employee’s 6.2 percent share of Social Security taxes, as well as income taxes. The employer and employee’s shares of Medicare taxes would also still apply to these wages.

New hires filling existing positions also qualify, but only if the workers they are replacing left voluntarily or for cause. Family members and other relatives do not qualify.

In addition, the new law requires that the employer get a statement from each eligible new hire certifying that he or she was unemployed during the 60 days before beginning work or, alternatively, worked less than a total of 40 hours for someone else during the 60 day period. The IRS is currently developing a form employees can use to make the required statement.

Business Income Tax Incentive

In addition, for each worker retained for at least a year, businesses may claim an additional general business tax credit, up to $1,000 per worker, when they file their 2011 income tax returns.

Businesses, agricultural employers, tax-exempt organizations and public colleges and universities all qualify to claim the payroll tax benefit for eligible newly-hired employees. Household employers cannot claim this new tax benefit.

Employers may claim the payroll tax benefit on the federal employment tax return they file quarterly with the IRS. Eligible employers will be able to claim the new tax incentive on their revised employment tax form for the second quarter of 2010.

 

 Section 179 Deductions Extended

Are you considering purchasing new office computers or furniture? Well, you’re in luck! The HIRE Act also extends Section 179 for one year.  Visit our previous blog post to determine qualifying property.